WTF

Athol Couple’s Totally Real Story About Getting Hit 4 Times By A Truck Driving 60 MPH Is Completely Believable And No One Should Doubt It

 

Fox 25 News: An Athol couple is warning other drivers after they say their car was pushed off the road in an apparent road-rage crash Friday night. Stacy and Joseph Schweitzer were heading home from dinner on Rte. 2 in Athol near Exit 18, around 10:30 p.m., when they say a truck began tailgating them on the single-lane stretch of highway. Stacy says she slowed down and the truck struck them the first time, and then twice more.

“I pushed on my brakes to let him know he’s following too close, and next thing I know, I told my husband, ‘He’s going to hit me,’” Stacy said. “And that’s when he hit me once. Then as I went further, he hit me again. So I went to turn into the break-down lane, and that’s when he hit the side of me and sent me off the side of the road.”

The Schweitzers’ car smashed into a barrier and nearly flipped, the front bumper falling off.

“[I’m] screaming, holding onto the brake, trying to get the car to stop,” Stacy said. “When I got out, I had to sit on the ground for a little bit, because I was really dizzy and just couldn’t walk at that moment, very shaken up about what just happened.”

Joseph called 911, and State Police responded but were not able to locate the suspect or the suspect’s vehicle.

“He shut his headlights off,” Joseph said. “So once we spun around… I looked to see if I could see the truck, and all his tail lights, everything were off. [I] couldn’t read the license plate or anything like that.”

The Schweitzers were only able to tell police the vehicle appeared to be a dark-colored pick-up truck. State Police tell Boston 25 News investigating the case is difficult without a more specific description of the truck.

Just to review what allegedly happened here.

  • They were driving 60 mph on Route 2 when a truck hit them not once, not twice, but three times
  • The truck that was tailgating them decided to turn their lights off for no apparent reason
  • When they finally pulled over (after being hit 3 times) the truck decided to sideswipe them too
  • After that they hit the jersey barrier, the bumper fell off, and somehow drove on 2 wheels before she got the car down and “landed” in the middle of the highway without flipping over
  • They don’t know anything about the truck that hit them besides the fact that it’s a dark colored pickup truck

I’m no car expert, but it would seem that if a truck smashed into their bumper THREE TIMES, going 60 mph, at least one of the vehicles would crash from that. Unless of course this was a stunt driver looking to fuck up some innocent people for absolutely no reason. Does this look like a bumper that was hit going 60 mph, three times?

My bumper looks worse than that just from parallel parking.

Now this is just me spitballing my opinions right now, but I’m gonna go out on a limb and say none of this ever happened. Maybe, just maybe, the dude had a little much to drink, hit something, and then they said the chick was driving when the cops go there. Maybe.

They also hadn’t filed a claim with their insurance company days after the crash.

Conveniently the guy turned his lights off so they couldn’t get his plates.  Plus they were dizzy from all the spinning and driving on two wheels.

Oh, and also no injuries whatsoever because….angels.

But they found a post on Facebook from someone in Rhode Island who also got hit by a truck, so it must’ve been the same guy.

According to a friend Stacy and Joe should’ve told the state police about “the other girl” because it “would’ve helped get your car fixed with insurance.” But the MSP told her she wasn’t allowed to mention this “other girl” on TV because “they can get in trouble.”

Yea, there’s nothing shady about this story whatsoever.

 

Please consider supporting local journalism by donating to the Turtle fund:




Follow us on Youtube, SoundCloud, Twitter, and Facebook.

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonitization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the PayPal button above if you’d like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy: 

 

51 Comment(s)
  • randiguy2006
    Wtf
    January 18, 2020 at 12:13 pm

    Why is the lamestream media ignoring this?

    Possibly because nobody gives a shit?

  • I See Dumb People
    I see dumb people... Everywhere
    January 18, 2020 at 10:48 am

    No way their story has any truth.. Look how low the damage on the rear bumper is.. If a truck actually rear ended them the damage would be much higher on the rear like more near the truck not the way bottom of the bumper.. Fucking morons

  • Trumpy Bear
    January 18, 2020 at 9:07 am

    Those two are very fake news.

    • Fotis Dulos
      January 18, 2020 at 10:34 am

      Back off Trumpy Bear! I believe them. Bet those two are fantastic water skiers.

  • Manute Bol
    January 18, 2020 at 2:43 am

    Stay away from the bath salts kids.

  • Silencio Dogood
    January 18, 2020 at 12:12 am

    in the end it’s just Athol Ahols.

  • Albert Schweitzer
    January 17, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    Stay positive Joe, you have a beautiful wife who just needs a few driving lessons. Pay no mind to all the pessimists on this blog.

  • Terry Nova's Massive Tits
    January 17, 2020 at 10:37 pm

    The only way to settle a dispute like this is trial by combat or trial by public pantsing. My favorites is the pantsing, tripping then bucket of water. Laws are so complicated you have to be creative these days, the whip cream pie is a also a nice touch… I said touch.. looolllz.

  • Stuntman Mike
    January 17, 2020 at 9:50 pm

    I was driving that truck, it’s death proof baby!

    • Evil Kneevil
      January 17, 2020 at 9:52 pm

      Sorry other stuntman mike, I didn’t see you first!

    • soxrock191
      Cottonmouth
      January 20, 2020 at 12:30 am

      Blahahaha must’ve felt like they were on Planet Terror

    • soxrock191
      Cottonmouth
      January 20, 2020 at 12:30 am

      Baby it’s you…….

  • Betty Ford
    January 17, 2020 at 9:37 pm

    What? You doubt this? Cmon man, “Duel” was real. Dennis Weaver, early 70s, the red Dart, that shit happened.

  • Johnnie AirMaxes
    January 17, 2020 at 7:57 pm

    Dark colored pick up truck…to rattled to read plates? Hold up I’ve seen this before…it reminds me of that kidnapping a month ago with that Spanish bitch with the smelly Pussy. He supposedly let her get away because he couldn’t bare the smell of her Brockton battered meat flap. Must’ve been the same guy!! Such braveness!! …Nope. Just another insecure sludge pump on Facebook making up stories again to get attention and feel loved cause dad ran away. Get a job. Fuckin loosah.

  • Two Patch Crappy Jack
    January 17, 2020 at 7:40 pm

    Drunk guy drives, smashed up car, wife says she drove and run off road. . can you say ” insurance fraud”? They’ll be moving to War Wack pretty soon

  • Sean M. McCarthy
    January 17, 2020 at 7:05 pm

    Those dings are called “Whiskey Dents”. That is my nickname even though the guys that gave it to me do not realize I don’t drink whiskey.

  • Brake Test Gone Wrong
    January 17, 2020 at 6:54 pm

    Their story is as plausible as anything else, if they were drinking they probably would have hauled ass home without notifying the police. Man mostly was drinking so wifey was driving home from dinnah.

    She said she hit the brakes before being hit so the speed was reduced not 60 anymore, bumped then again then side swiped into a barrier. They could have rolled flipped exploded anything can happen in an accident this how this one ended up.

    “conveniently turned off his lights” The perp shut off their lights to avoid identification and aid in leaving the scene not a new move.

    Most likely a chubby white liberal female driver of the pickup truck texting and raging at Trump didn’t know she had been in an accident or that she was even driving. Then turned the lights off by accident trying to do her makeup or plug in her 12 volt vibrator. Look for PU truck with some damage to front and right side with a Bernie or Liz Warren sticker on the back. Runner up suspect is a fat neck beard union douche with same damage and a (Im a union thug) sticker on the back along with a faded Hillary 2016 (I’m with her sticker) , look for jizz marks on a Liz Warren or Bernie photo taped to the dashboard.

    • Hugh-Bo Mont
      January 18, 2020 at 11:07 am

      I doubt she braked hard enough to stop, rather she tapped the brakes. However, a car going 60 gets hit by a truck going 62 or so is exactly like hitting something not moving at 2 mph or so. Probably a little more since the truck is a little heavier. Unc didnt do so well in physics. The back of the car would look like that in this case. 50-50 she’s fibbing.

  • Stuntman Mike
    January 17, 2020 at 6:36 pm

    Couple of pussies, I was just having a little fun

  • Cheddah
    January 17, 2020 at 6:34 pm

    Slow news day on a Friday..

  • Stacy and Joe are Liars
    January 17, 2020 at 5:33 pm

    Thanks TB for exposing these two scumbags for the fucking liars that they are.
    It’s about time someone did something about insurance fraudsters like these two. Once the RMV investigates I hope they take their licenses and fine them for being dirt bags.

  • private I
    January 17, 2020 at 4:14 pm

    How would a truck do low bumper damage like that? shady….

  • E.Norma Stitz
    January 17, 2020 at 4:04 pm

    Where is the GoFundMe page? Ready to donate to these trustworthy people.

    FUCK OFF WHITE TRASH
    -E.Norma Stitz

  • Michael Pensack
    The Engineer
    January 17, 2020 at 3:40 pm

    Long time turtle rider here who’s an automotive engineer. You got this one wrong unc, one vehicle going 60 and one going 65 and collide is the same as a 5 mph rolling hit to a parked car, its going to be minor damage to the rear. The story may be a little embellished and one sided, but its consistent with the vehicle damage. Also on older vehicles before automatic and daytime running lights were standard you can turn off all lights while driving, even the plate lights, I have that capability on my 8 year old vehicle. What really happened is they were going really slow in the left lane, the truck came up and started tailgating, dude was probably buzzed, they brake checked the dude, the dude couldn’t react in time and bumped them, they braked again, 2nd bump while decelerating and drifting to the right, 3rd bump resulted in the dodge starting to spin out. Dude in truck got freaked out, didn’t want to pull over because he was buzzed/drunk, took off down the highway and shutoff his lights. There was a full moon out on Jan 10th so you can see pretty good in the dark driving without headlights.

    • Silencio Dogood
      January 18, 2020 at 12:05 am

      back in the early 1970’s i drove on the Moon and it was indeed very bright!

  • Mona Lisa Vito
    January 17, 2020 at 3:37 pm

    The car that made these two, equal-length tire marks had positraction. You can’t make these marks without positraction, which was not available on a dark colored pick-up truck with its lights turned off!

    • Jerry Callo
      January 17, 2020 at 5:27 pm

      And why not? What is positraction?

      • fucking aye no respec
        January 17, 2020 at 6:59 pm

        Ayyy shut up you… the lady is representing the 2 yuts.

    • Red dog
      January 18, 2020 at 8:56 am

      Thank you Miss Vito

  • G
    January 17, 2020 at 3:33 pm

    That bitch was getting tailgated and hit her brakes so the way I see it ,she or he caused that accident and deserved it. I would have hit her and kept going too . Dumb kunt.learn how to drive.

    • Jerry Callo
      January 17, 2020 at 5:26 pm

      And why not? What is positraction?

    • That Guy
      January 17, 2020 at 6:52 pm

      Still would.

    • Sarah Rudner
      January 17, 2020 at 7:03 pm

      You strike a moving vehicle from behind on the highway you are at fault. If you couldn’t stop in time then a second charge of following too close.

  • bigdaddy
    bigdaddy
    January 17, 2020 at 3:32 pm

    Isnt that stretch of 2 Rt still 2 lanes in each direction?

    • X
      January 17, 2020 at 4:52 pm

      No, the divided highway ends a few miles before this, the westbound side was never built for the last 10 miles to the Route 202 exit, and beyond that it’s the original road.

  • dr. fill
    January 17, 2020 at 3:22 pm

    This is an entirely plausible situation. And they didn’t get rear ended at 60 MPH, both cars were traveling at similar speeds, dipshit. See the appraiser’s post below. Turtle does it again! (Another shit article.)

  • Dog Park Debbie
    January 17, 2020 at 3:19 pm

    Who knows. Remember when you believed Franklin Baxley and ruined that poor girl’s reputation? Is Franklin still in jail? Poor Dog Park Debbie.

    Also what has become of Maude the Fraud? We need updates of these people. Juicing Jeremy?

  • Spic Tormentor
    January 17, 2020 at 2:53 pm

    Who the fuck drives a dodge sedan in 2020

  • Travis Rearick
    just came over to say hi, Bernie
    January 17, 2020 at 2:41 pm

    oh They’re from athol? That’s all I need to know

  • X
    January 17, 2020 at 2:38 pm

    Isn’t that road posted at 55?
    So if you’re already speeding and someone tailgates you, isn’t it prudent to pull over and let the idiot pass you?

    And the problem with hitting your brakes it what if the driver behind you is drunk?

    That said, it’s entirely possible that they’re telling the truth. One vehicle tapping another at 60 MPH it’s not going to do much damage as both are moving, and being hit from behind on a straight road it’s not necessarily going to cause you to lose control. (Remember the pit maneuver is something else entirely.)

    And if you only carry liability insurance there’s no sense telling your insurance company.

  • Move over
    January 17, 2020 at 2:36 pm

    If there was a truck that did this then he is my hero! If you’re doing 60mph in the fast lane then you deserve to be rammed in the back end. I’ve secretly dreamt of doing this myself.

  • Judge dread
    January 17, 2020 at 2:29 pm

    The driver was obviously drunk and his hoe gf covered for his ass.

    Let’s see going 60mph which is roughly 180’ per second and you hit someone in the bumper will cause it to be completely fucked up.

    Also, they said they spun around 3 times, well sweetheart the damage to your vehicle indicates you were hit onc the front left side wheel area. If someone were to hit you there, you wouldn’t spin out, you go off the road. If they hit you in the left rear shell, then you would spin out. That’s how physics works.

    Also no side damage or paint marks of any kind. Like uncle said my bumper haste damage usg from parallel parking in Somerville.

    That’s why they’re not filing an insurance claim, because insurance adjusters will figure this out, and frankly the police should investigate this for filing a false police report.

    These slugrakes are just making this shit up to get social media attention. Notice how they posted pictures of the TV crew and shit? Social media is a real problem for society.

    • Judge dread
      January 17, 2020 at 2:33 pm

      Fucking iOS auto correct, but you know what I’m saying.

    • quiet down child
      January 17, 2020 at 7:08 pm

      There’s no way to predict what will happen in an accident like that. You’re full of yourself and have zero driving experience to make such stupid comments.

  • JJ@AOL.COM
    JJ
    January 17, 2020 at 2:23 pm

    Hmmm seems like maybe she was a lil tipsy off that glass of booze she was drinking in the picture. The license plate running light is always on day or night. Nice try bimbo! Looks like you backed up into someone or something and hit a few things leaving the restaurant. That is not damage from a truck going 60mph, you would have no rear end. You yourself probably have no rear end because you look like a pig. That’s damage from you backing into someone or something at 10mph then sideswiping god knows what doing 35 to 40 mph. Fuck outta here with your lame excuse for driving drunk and hitting a few things on the way out! You’re just trying to scam the insurance company but now you realize the police are involved and that’s why you still have not filed the claim, dumb bitch.

  • no name
    January 17, 2020 at 2:22 pm

    The damage in the back is consistent with two vehicles traveling at nearly the same speed, if one car is doing 55 and the other 57, it is the difference in speed times mass you look at. The damage to the front is consistent with the claim narrative. I am a licensed appraiser and investigate questionable claims ( special investigation unit for a large insurance company)

    • A man who knows things
      January 17, 2020 at 2:27 pm

      Special kind of idiot to believe that story is more like it!

      • MCG’s smoke detector batteries
        Hollywoo Stars and Celebrities What Do They Know? Do They Know Things? Let’s Find Out!
        January 17, 2020 at 7:00 pm

        Indeed

    • X
      January 17, 2020 at 2:50 pm

      Exactly. The only thing I would add is if it was a deliberate hit, the weights the two vehicles may not matter if the vehicle behind immediately brakes after contact — it isn’t a complete collision.

      Accidents are also traumatic and this wouldn’t be the first person to think the vehicle spun when it actually didn’t.

    • Peter North
      January 17, 2020 at 3:41 pm

      Hi Mr licensed appraiser-special investigator,
      You might want to take into account the height of the front bumper of a peek up truck in relationship to the scuff mark (caused by the ball of one’s foot) on the rear bumper of the Dodge avenger. I haven’t seen many peek up truck bumpers that are 10 to 12″ off of the ground. You stupid fuckwad.
      KAG
      Nancy Pelosi does Adam Schiff with a strapon, film at 11

      • jeep queefs
        January 17, 2020 at 7:15 pm

        By law bumper heights have to overlap on light vehicles just because the roof is higher doesn’t mean the bumpers can’t make contact.

        Unless you’re a 40 year old compulsive dating, female abusing, CrossFit closet homosexual man with constant manicured 5 day beard and a designer wardrobe. Driving a jacked up jeep and always bragging about your carry weapon to hide your homosexuality from the friends family and the public.

        ps some SUV’s and Jeeps can appear to be a pickup in a rear view especially in poor lighting. Probably a leased jeep Cherokee or beater dodge pu.

Leave a Reply to JJ Cancel reply

*

RELATED POSTS
This Truck Driver Was Really, Really Pissed About The 65 Car Accident Pile Up On 290 In Worcester.
Chinese Guy Jumps Seven Floors To His Death To Get Out Of Shopping With Girlfriend
South African Dude Who Pretended To Sign Language Obama’s Nelson Mandela Speech Is Apparently An Insane Murdering Rapist?