Check out more hot takes from Dubsism
So Blackstone killer Mom Erika Murray had her arraignment yesterday in Worcester Superior Court and pleaded not guilty to murdering two of her children and abusing or endangering four others . I’ve seen this piece of human garbage several times in the news now and every single time she’s wearing this same Goddamn outfit. Here she was back in September:
and here she was yesterday:
Ummmm, don’t they wear uniforms in prison? Shouldn’t she be wearing some state issued clothing are something? Has she been wearing this same Goddamn outfit for the last four months? I noticed she went with the classic pony tail look for this appearance, but would a change of clothes be too much to ask for? I can just smell her all the way from Worcester. She looks like every woman I’ve ever seen at the Leicester Walmart. Although when you think about it, making her have to wear the same exact outfit every day for the rest of her life would be an appropriate form of punishment if you ask me.
Seriously though, what’s up with that? If you’re not wearing the jump suit shouldn’t you at least be wearing court clothes? Now I’ve been to the Worcester Courthouse too many times for my liking. And when I go I notice that me and the lawyers are the only ones who aren’t dressed to go to a barbecue on the front lawn of a triple decker. But this isn’t some nobody being charged with prostitution for the 18th time. This is kind of a high profile case. Couldn’t her lawyer get her a pants suit or a sun dress or something? I mean, does the prison wash this outfit for her for special occasions like this?
Anyway, every time you read about this story it gets more disgusting. According to the Telegram, “both of the children were malnourished and that the 3-year-old was unable to walk or talk. The older child had to have maggots removed from her ears in order to hear properly.”
Fucking disgusting. How can someone let that go on for three freaking years? Why put the kids through that? The other kids she apparently killed within a week or two of coming out of the womb. But this poor kid? Why would she put this kid through this? Oh yea, because she’s a selfish piece of human garbage:
The prosecutor said Ms. Murray told police she knew Mr. Rivera did not want to have any more children after the birth of their 10-year-old son and realized they could not afford it. Yet, she continued to have unprotected sex with Mr. Rivera and placed the 3-year-old and five-month-old in filth to hide them from her boyfriend.
Oh I see. So she realized she couldn’t afford to have any more kids, but she just couldn’t resist an all you can ride pass form Ray Rivera. I mean, the man just oozes sexuality:
Once again this shows two things:
1) She’s a selfish dooshnozzle who knew exactly what she was doing.
2) You’re a moron if you don’t think Ray Rivera didn’t know about all the babies.
Think about it. Obviously this lady couldn’t get enough unprotected hanky-panky with Ray Ray. So when she was five, six, seven, eight months pregnant, did he just magically stop being horny? Because if we’re to believe that he didn’t know about these kids then logically he couldn’t have known she was pregnant. And where was Ray Ray laying the pipe? In his dungeon of a basement that he supposedly never left? Because if he was doing the deed upstairs with her, wouldn’t he have smelled all the dead bodies and/or heard the living children crying and screaming for help?
At the very least wouldn’t he have looked at this
and said to himself, “maybe I should clean this shit up.”?
As you know Turtleboy Sports is a family feminist blog. We take issue with the way this sentence was worded:
“Yet, she continued to have unprotected sex with Mr. Rivera”
Oh, so SHE continued to have unprotected with with HIM. Not the other way around. He was a toy for her pleasure. He had NOTHING to do with it. He certainly didn’t make a choice to have unprotected sex with her. It was the other way around. Why not just say, “they continued to have unprotected sex?” Seems kind of sexist to me.
And why is the DA making up excuses for HIM? Why is he saying she, “placed the 3-year-old and five-month-old in filth to hide them from her boyfriend?” Why is the state taking such an active interest in painting a picture of him as a rogue dumbass? Why is his knowledge or lack thereof even being brought up at all? He’s not on trial here.
Anyway, we’ll be seeing her again in February. The question is, will she be wearing this same exact outfit then?
Feel free to share your thoughts to keep the conversation going.
Check out more hot takes from Dubsism