Photographer Meg Bitton Defends Her Pictures Of Pedophile Spank Bank Material And Kids Doing Drug, Says She’s Depicting Her Life Growing Up In The 70’s, Idiots Defend Her

Follow @TurtleboyNews on Twitter by clicking here.

Follow Turtleboy on Instagram by clicking here.

Follow and like the Turtleboy Sports Returns, and Phil Prentiss to keep up with the hilarious turtle rider commentary.

Want to advertise with Turtleboy? Email us at for more information.

If you like free speech and want to support what we’re doing, feel free to donate to the Turtle fund:







Hey fam – if you’d like to support Turtleboy and what we do here, feel free to hit the donate button at the top. We basically have to run this site like a Bernie Sanders campaign now since we’ve been blacklisted by Google and Facebook, due to the fact that rabid SJWs keep reporting our posts. Getting blacklisted by Google is a death sentence for most websites, since it’s much harder to monetize. And we all know the damage Facebook has done. We’re never going to stop fighting for free speech, but in the meantime the best way for turtle riders to fight back is to donate to the cause. Without you people none of this is possible. We love you all.


The photography community is up in arms after our recent stories about photographer Meg Bitton’s disgusting sexualization of children in images she has posted on social media. Search for “Meg Bitton” on Twitter or Facebook and look what comes up. It seems like the rest of the sane world agrees with us that this is not “art”:

This is just a sick, perverse adult stealing innocence from children.

We also missed something in this image:

The girl is holding rolling papers. She can’t be a day older than 9 and she’s promoting the legalization of weed while rolling doobeys. I’m 1,000% pro-pot. Just not for 9 year olds. Nine year old kids don’t smoke weed. It’s not a normal part of growing up. If it was for you then you should seek psychiatric help because you’re probably extremely damaged.

Yesterday our posts on her pictures were pulled down by Facebook:

So Facebook will allow this blue checkmarked pervert to post the pictures, but we get taken down for exposing her. Makes sense.

Somehow we also missed this one:

Those girls are blowing cocaine. That’s clearly what the picture is implying. Why else would you hold a rolled up $100 bill? And where did these girls get $100 bills from? Oh yea….

Hooking of course.

Does child prostitution happen? Yes. In Thailand. In America I’m sure it happens in certain places, but it certainly isn’t in the middle of a New York street where anyone can see them.

Here’s another one….

Yup. She’s drinking booze out of a flask. An 11 year old child.

Or this picture which is still up on IG:

What is her fascination with showing little girls like this? Only a sick, childless woman could ever think this is OK. Then again, these girls all have parents who allowed this monster to profit off of their kids like this.

This is a gold mine for sexual predators. Just look at the comment from Bobby Couto:

“Naughty twirl.” Yup. That guy likes naked kids, which is why he follows Meg Bitton in the first place.

I don’t even wanna know what this is supposed to mean….

Or what the fuck this is….

And check out the caption of this picture, which clearly depicts a bunch of children trying to have sex with a man with a walkie talkie in his pocket….


As is he gets to choose which one of these children he is going to have sex with. But it’s OK because the girls are “#Beyou.” This is just them expressing themselves through the forfeiture of their innocence.

Well, the other day on Facebook Meg Bitton explained to the world why there was nothing wrong with these pictures….

She’s comparing herself to Sally Mann, a legendary urban photojournalist whose pictures were filled with realism and told a story about day to day life in NYC. The fact that she thinks that her fantasy pictures of child hookers rolling doobeys and blowing yayo is the same thing is laughable, were it not so sad and pathetic.

The children in the pictures she claims she is modeling her work after are all fully clothed. The women in roller blades are adults. There is no drug use in any of them, and certainly no kids doing drugs. There are no hashtags about #Choice or #Beyou.

More importantly, Sally Mann didn’t glamorize her subjects. It’s kind of like what David Simon did with The Wire. Most of the drug dealers and gang bangers die or go to jail in the The Wire. The cops and the lawyers all live. Characters like Wallace, Bodie, and D’Angelo Barksdale are all broken on the inside and feel trapped in the lifestyle they were born into. Nayman Brice puts on a front like he’s a cold gangster but cries and runs to the suburbs the moment he gets the chance. Because at the end of the day there’s nothing glamorous about the drug trade.

Meg Bitton does the opposite with the children she exploits. She covers them in makeup and makes them look happy. She infers with #BeYou that this is a lifestyle they want. This does not happen in real life. There is no segment of society she’s actually portraying with her work. She’s exploiting kids for the purposes of exploitation.

Oh, and she says that she grew up in 1970’s New York, which makes her probably at least 50. So she’s basically a grandmother who is doing this.

And no, this had nothing to do with her childhood. She was not a child prostitute. She probably saw Taxi Driver and figured this is what day to day life was like for the average 11 year old in New York. Except Jodi Foster was 14 in that movie, and a victim, and her lifestyle and choices were not glamorized.

She removed the images that she “stands by” which is complete hypocrisy. If you stand by something you keep it up. These are wrong, she knows it, she got caught, and now she’s trying to defend it.

She’s also taken down hundreds of comments and banned users who are critical of her work. Art is supposed to be interpretative. Not everyone will like it. Censoring negative comments is the exact opposite of what a real artist would do. Then again Meg Bitton is not a real artist. She’s just a pervert with a camera.

Here’s another guy defending her work:

Yea guys, if you don’t like all the kiddie porn just keep on scrolling. Barry here is having a great time looking at it:

Stop ruining his buzz.

He was far from the only pervert defending this exploitation of children under the guise of art…

“She’s my best friend. Therefore it’s OK for her to force kids to pretend to be doing lines of yayo off of a car before selling their bodies for more drug money.”

Sarah also thinks that WE are the ones sexualizing the girls:

I can’t believe there are so many people who are this stupid.

Read this INSANE justification of the picture of the John picking up the child hookers….

Well, there she is folks – the dumbest woman on the Internet:

The mental gymnastics she had to go through to reach that conclusion are the most exercise she’s gotten in quite some time.

Then there was this:

Oh yea, Melody Hood knows all about what it was like growing up in New York in the 70’s. Even though she appears to be in her 30’s and according to her website she works out of Chatanooga, Tennessee. These are the same people who say dumb shit like, “In the ghetto, I heard black people sell drugs.” Everything they think they know about the reality of urban life comes from watching movies.

Oh, she also knows the girls too, and they’re sweet:

Therefore it’s OK to exploit them.

Renata, Buffy, and Charles claim that this was their childhood depicted…..

“Never did drug, never drank.”

In that case morons, this was NOT your childhood then:

Others pointed out how her pictures of girls in bathing suits eating ice cream didn’t make everyone upset:

Yea genius, because kids playing in sprinklers and eating ice cream on hot summer days is normal. Kids blowing lines and banging adults isn’t.

Tracey brings up a good point….

“They are photos on a page. Not real life in front of you.”

Exactly. Meg Bitton is claiming that she is depicting reality. She’s not. She’s just dressing girls up like whores because she’s a pervert. And if she were a dude none of you frauds would be defending her.

Here’s an even dumber comment:

“Where you there?”

No, but I saw the end product. This is not art. It’s kiddie porn. And you’re a shitty person for defending it.

And this….

“I don’t see someone trying to glamorize child pornography. I see reality.”

Bitch, they’re wearing makeup. They look happy. They’re kissing and drinking hooch. They look clean and healthy. Child prostitutes are the ultimate victims. They are shattered and broken. If she wanted to depict the cold reality of child prostitution (which doesn’t happen in the middle of a NYC street) she would show them as such. Instead she glamorized it.

And finally this….

Well Patricia, back in your day people were stupid. Catholic priests raped little boys and other adults covered it up because you were taught to keep your opinion to yourself, and if you didn’t have anything nice to say than don’t say anything at all. Which is why so many more kids were raped. That’s you Patricia. You’re the one who wants people to stay quiet while kids are taken advantage of. This doesn’t make you a good person. It actually makes you a monster. Just like Meg Bitton.

17 Comment(s)
  • Womenz Can't Be Pedophiles!
    September 3, 2018 at 9:09 am

    Vapid “photographer” (read: skunt with an expensive camera) trying to get her 15 minutes by depicting outrageous content. Liberals and their fucking “art.”
    10 years old is too young. Gross.

  • If the Shoe Fits
    September 2, 2018 at 7:29 pm

    Pedophiles are her only market for these sexualized child photos, like selling “bath salts” before they were out lawed, nobody used them to take a bath. Why not use 18+ models and make them look younger or better yet use women and have them look like adult women… oh that would just be another porn site.

  • Disco Sucks
    September 2, 2018 at 5:56 pm

    Late 70’s in the Boston burbs: Shorts and tube tops in summer? Yep, common. The panty looking shorts like the girl against the wall is wearing? Not that I remember (and no boots with shorts). Girls wearing makeup by 12, sure. Kids were smoking @ 10, some drinking @ 11 (stolen liquor/beer from parents or the odd beer or two from an older friend/sibling). Smoking pot at 12, but I’m pretty sure some younger kids were too. Blow and harder drugs were being done at 13-14 but not often for blow, too expensive for common use. I remember one girl knocked up at 13 but 13 was mostly BJ’s. Girls wore one piece suits & bikinis at the beach, I’ve seen 12 YO looking girls wearing thongs at a local public beach area now.
    The girl leaning against the wall would be way too young for wearing a pot leaf shirt and those shorts look like panties.
    Lesbianism? Can’t say but it was generally looked down on by kids then. I remember ~9 or 10 I was visiting relatives in Elizabeth, NJ and was out one night walking down the street and came upon two dykes making out in a recessed stairs & gate from the sidewalk I was on but they were 15-16 I’d say. I startled them, I’m sure my face looked surprised as well.

    • 1970's child
      September 3, 2018 at 9:30 am

      I know what you’re talking about, 70’s were a weird time to be a kid it was the last of your on your own era. Big families both parents working, wealth didn’t exist like it does now, kids traveled in big groups and got by on their own or with the help of the group. Sometimes older kids or men in their early 20’s would step in to help the under-dog kid. I remember one of my friends getting hit by a car when we were on bikes he was thrown on mostly ok his bike was destroyed. A garbage man pulled his truck over and got all the drivers info and went up one side of her and down the other. It was a rough time but it made us tough and resourceful.

      We knew who the weirdos were, we were told who to stay away from or what houses not to go in even if it seemed ok. The kids who got snagged by the weirdos were obviously changed by it and that did happen. You had to be faster and think ahead of the whoever else was around. It was an exciting time, bumper riding cars to school, broken bones and stitches, signing casts. Watching the movie “slum dog millionaire” it reminded me of growing up around Boston in the 70’s.. anything went.

  • JD
    September 2, 2018 at 3:38 pm

    Meg Bitton, you filthy old pedo-madam-pimpette-pornographer and all-around kiddy diddler! I’m about the same age as this nasty old broad and no, that is not what all girls wore and did “back then.” I look at her photos of 5 year old girls with full makeup and fake eyelashes and it’s Jon Benet Ramsey looking at me crying “help me!”

    And her supporters? What a load of steaming turds! If a male photographer did this…c’mon!

    THEY (far left nutbags, SJW psychos and the like) are trying to normalize pedophilia.

  • Bill Clinton
    September 2, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    I think I remember these girls on the Lolita Express…Oh yeah they were a lot of fun. Even Hillary got down with these youngsters. I was wondering if the photographer could send me a few pairs of the models’ dirty stinky panties. Then I could be sure. Oh by the way:
    Vote Democrat…..Vote Often so you can get us (meaning Hillary and Me) and of course Carlos Danger back on that plane so the good times can roll again.

  • ncfoothillbilly
    September 2, 2018 at 2:51 pm

    This is what needs done…

  • Judge dread
    September 2, 2018 at 1:08 pm

    I said it before and I will say it again. Bring out the industrial grade wood chipper, fed meg and her supporters into it, and direct the output right into he sewer wear it belongs.

    There’s nothing worse than females that make pedo spank bank pictures. The chipper is fired up… let’s roll.

  • hank
    September 2, 2018 at 11:04 am

    Can someone step up as a male “artist” , recreate these shots and post them to social media? It would be a great test of the defenders logic to hear them say this is “art” when a man is taking the photos. I know it won’t happen because anyone with half a brain knows they’d be destroyed and their life ruined the second they post. ButAnyone who sees innocence in these photos are more likely than not, a kid toucher themselves.

  • She’s knows what she’s doing
    September 2, 2018 at 10:47 am

    She knows damn well that there’s a market for this. She has no illusions about whose attention her work is drawing or the exact nature of what she’s indulging. This is no different than the YouTube videos of young girls dressed as mermaids or in bikinis together in the bathtub drawing millions of monetized hits.

  • Stunt Penis
    September 2, 2018 at 10:15 am

    Maura “Lezzie Licky” Healy certainly won’t investigate this.

    But… if the photographer were a Trump supporter…

  • Sloppy
    September 2, 2018 at 9:59 am

    Wanna get her shut down quick? Start online rumors that she’s a Trump supporter, that she eats at Chik Fil A, and that she was once seen at a pro-life rally.
    See, the problem is that she believes in 58 genders, shops vegan at Whole Foods, and probably has Elizabeth Warren bumper stickers on her Subaru Forester. Therefore, she’s an edgy ‘ARTIST’, just ‘provoking us to think’ and ‘explore our own inner-…’ some crap or another.
    If she was a 2nd Amendment supporter who buys her groceries at Market Basket and loads them into her Chevy Tahoe, why, then she’d just be a sick perverted predator who takes pictures of little kids in their undies.

  • Ozzy
    September 2, 2018 at 9:43 am

    Where to begin. I know ‘Fuck morals, decency,common sense,respect the list goes on. We no longer stand for the flag. We are no longer just male or female. We have at least 58 genders we can go by. Even if you aren’t taking part in the conversation you can feel offended and get someone in trouble. You are able to take pictures of underage children and pretty much dress them any way you want. Pose them in any position you want and call it art. I wonder whatever happened to our moral society. One time we pretty much looked after one another. Things like this wouldn’t have been acceptable not that long ago. Maybe we should tweak our moral compass a little bit and try going back to our common sense ways. I know I’m fantasizing here so I guess I’ll just go back to the new phrase. Fuck morals,decency common sense,respect.

  • They walk among us
    September 2, 2018 at 9:00 am

    These are the same kind of people who call anything that they don’t agree with hate speech, support safe spaces, compile exhaustive gender pronoun lists and demand a separate bathroom for each one of them, and are offended by the American flag. 

  • Karma
    September 2, 2018 at 8:40 am

    If we refuse to protect the innocent then we will rot, Sammy, Stephanie, Patricia,and all the rest, you now belong to a very special group of people. Your unofficial “Marina spirit dinner” leader will make sure that you are remembered for defending all these “artists”. Thank you turtle riders, we have to stop this……

  • Fucking Pedos!
    September 2, 2018 at 8:37 am

    That stupid cunt (and all her “supporters”) are using these pics to masturbate with. She takes the pics home, lubes up her giant black dildo and slams it home to O-Town. Pedophiles don’t just come in creepy old man guises; pedos come in all forms.

  • Diane Woods emerson
    September 2, 2018 at 8:33 am

    Hahaha. If you can’t be nice say nothing. Well I’m NOT nice so fuck Meg bitten. It’s a shame more people dont open their mouths. She needs to stop and shouldn’t the cops be interested? Christ I know someone in mass whose texts were used a sex evidence. And these pics are entirely worse than than words in a text wtf. I don’t get it.

Comment on this Post


Nostalgic Facebook Commentators Are Really Pissed Off About Snow Days For Kids
Guy Who Tried Hiding In Tree To Flee Cops on I-290 Earns Moron of the Week Award
Auburn Fan Who Refused To Bet On Florida State Loses Chance To Win Free $25,000 Is Giant Moron