Social Justice Warriors

Elizabeth Warren Wants You To Vote Yes On 3 So That Boys Can Continue To Beat Up On Girls In High School Sports In The Name Of Trans Rights And Wokeness

"I Am Turtleboy" now available on Amazon

Follow and like the Turtleboy Sports Returns, and TB Rider to keep up with the hilarious turtle rider commentary.

Want to advertise with Turtleboy? Email us at [email protected] for more information.

If you like free speech and want to support what we’re doing, feel free to donate to the Turtle fund:




 

 

 

 

 

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonitization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the PayPal button above if you’d like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship.

 

Election Day is 2 weeks away and we really wanna start hammering out who we’re endorsing for the Turtleboy Ticket. As we stated earlier this week, we are not endorsing yes or no on question 1, because we respect nurses, and no matter which way we vote it will be voting against nurses since they’re divided on the issue. Question 2 is stupid, symbolic ballot measure that urges the State to pass a 28th Amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision. Personally, I believe the people shouldn’t overturn Supreme Court decisions by voting on ballot questions, so we’re gonna go with no on that one as well.

But really the one with the biggest implications is Question 3, which would potentially get rid of an already existing law that allows people to choose their gender identity and be accommodated as such:

This law adds gender identity to the list of prohibited grounds for discrimination in places of public accommodation, resort, or amusement. Such grounds also include race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, disability, and ancestry. A “place of public accommodation, resort or amusement” is defined in existing law as any place that is open to and accepts or solicits the patronage of the general public, such as hotels, stores, restaurants, theaters, sports facilities, and hospitals. “Gender identity” is defined as a person’s sincerely held gender-related identity, appearance, or behavior, whether or not it is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth.

This law prohibits discrimination based on gender identity in a person’s admission to or treatment in any place of public accommodation. The law requires any such place that has separate areas for males and females (such as restrooms) to allow access to and full use of those areas consistent with a person’s gender identity. The law also prohibits the owner or manager of a place of public accommodation from using advertising or signage that discriminates on the basis of gender identity.

I have no problem with a law that would ban a hotel or a restaurant from denying the right of a transgender person from doing business there. Transgender people are people and they shouldn’t denied access to things, so long as they’re not infringing on the privacy rights of others. When there’s dong in the women’s locker room at the YMCA, that’s a problem. Women shouldn’t have to look at dong in the YMCA locker room. That’s just common sense. And this law so loosely defines transgender that there will be plenty of dong everywhere now.

Three big problems with this:

  1. How does the law define what person is “sincerely” transgender, and what person isn’t? If you see a dude going into the women’s locker room how do you test his sincerity that he is in fact a transgender woman? You can’t. You just have to take his word for it. Don’t tell me that it will never happen, because it has. If you’re not prepared for what to do in a situation like that, then you shouldn’t vote to have a law like this.
  2. This FORCES private businesses like restaurants to let people use the bathroom or locker room of their choice based on their “sincere” gender identity. It’s one thing if a public institution (library, city hall) is forced to do this, but to force a privately owned business to participate in bunk science (the idea that we get to choose our gender) is un-American.
  3. This law makes it perfectly legal for boys to become transgender girls, and then compete against biological girls in high school athletics. And if you don’t think this will be exploited, just look what happened in Connecticut last year:

A biological boy not only won the girl’s 100 and 200 meter races at the State Championship meet, he smashed both state records. Don’t tell me there aren’t loopholes, because this is one of them. Oh, and he competed on the BOY’S team in the winter, where his times were good, but not State Championship good. And did I mention the second place finisher was also a transgender girl who previously competed as a boy?

If you think this is normal, or good, or progressive, you are a very, very stupid person. There’s no other way around it. You don’t like girls as much as you like boys who say they are girls. Just admit it. You are so “progressive” that you are allowing biological boys to beat and take things from biological girls. There is nothing these girls can do to beat these boys, because there are biological differences between boys and girls. They can’t train harder because no matter what their ceiling will be lower due to the fact that they are girls. This is the whole point of separating genders in sports. If we didn’t do this then boys would win everything. We separate the genders to create fairness for girls. And now “progressives” want to undo the gains that feminists fought for when it came to girl’s athletics, and give it right back to the boys.

This is why you should vote No on Question 3 – because our daughters and our sisters shouldn’t have to compete against boys who say they are girls. If you say it won’t happen you are willfully ignoring the fact that it has happened in the state next to us. There will be much, much more of this in the future. Maybe these two boys are “sincere” about being transgender, but eventually some boy who is “insincere” will do it as well, and you’ll have no way of measuring whether or not he is in fact “sincere.” I figured it would take something absolutely insane, like a boy breaking the state record in a girl’s track event, in order for this to change, but evidently that hasn’t happened.

Of course Elizabeth Warren is a big proponent of Yes on 3:

She’s such a dirty liar. “Our opponent smeared trans people.” This is what they say about you when you stand up for girls now. You hate “trans people.” Because trans people now come before women on the oppression scale. And these biological girls have no choice but to go along with it, because if they DARE to speak out against this they’ll be accused of trying to “smear trans people” by charlatans like Pocahontas.

Of course she framed it like it’s discrimination:

And she’s right, it is discrimination. We discriminate all the time. There are all boys and all girls high schools. Boys are not allowed to compete in girls sports. Transgender girls aren’t barred from competing, they just have to compete against other people who share the same biology as them.

And when Geoff Diehl, in his church mouse voice, pointed out that loopholes like the one in Connecticut exist….

Pocahontas responded by calling it an “ugly, ugly smear”

Because it never happens. Except when it does:

One state over. If you vote Yes on 3, this is what you’re voting for. You’re free to do as you please, but just understand that by doing so you no longer get to say that you give a shit about women. You don’t.

22 Comment(s)
  • Princess Gray Beaver
    October 24, 2018 at 6:01 pm

    Many moons ago Lizzy’s grandmama sucked off a Cherokee in his teepee. That gave her minority status at Harvard. Such a brilliant institution. Now she is an expert on everything and a snappy dresser.

  • Turd Reversalist
    October 24, 2018 at 12:12 am

    Hypothetical question; Do you think Dizzy Lizzy would go into a tizzy if I pushed the slicked up rod into her hole o’shizzy?
    I bet that dirtstar is still pretty snug.
    Definitely have to gag her with her granny panties and pull the popped collar shirt up over her head like she was a loser in a hockey fight before roundly rogering her 0.095471% cherokee cheerio.
    There would most certainly be a trail of tears and snailtrail poop smears on the bed linen.
    She can blame Trump while I give her netherhole the baby batter pump.
    Just sayin’, juuuuust playin’.

  • jamalkashoogi's severed cock
    October 23, 2018 at 8:29 pm

    fuck u lizzie warren. You should get your nipples pierced

  • Dick Dastardly
    October 23, 2018 at 8:08 pm

    Fuck it, I’m voting yes on 3 and once it passes I’m buying a wig so I can go into women’s locker rooms, whip my cock out and violently jerk off!!! I’m fun like that.

    • Sarah Silverfish
      October 24, 2018 at 8:08 am

      Louis CK is that you?

  • Tom Blackburn
    October 23, 2018 at 7:42 pm

    Government needs to mass exterminate trannys NOW!

  • Abdi Konadu
    October 23, 2018 at 5:49 pm

    So when I run the Boston Marathon next year all I have to do is register as a woman, collect my 150k then live like a king for the rest of my life in my home country? That beats mining diamonds by hand or joining up with the local warlord. 

  • P.T. Barnum
    October 23, 2018 at 5:23 pm

    What about Siamese twins that each identify as something different than the other?

  • Wwy
    October 23, 2018 at 5:16 pm

    TB needs help in politics and sports.

  • Hmmmm
    October 23, 2018 at 5:15 pm

    Don’t they make them go through blood testing and make sure that there’s no foreign substances in them before competitions? I highly doubt someone would claim to be a transgender person just to win a sporting event.

  • Randall Guy
    October 23, 2018 at 4:50 pm

    You’re such a moron, thats not what its about.

  • Stunt Penis
    October 23, 2018 at 4:41 pm

    I hate to say this about anyone, but, this woman perhaps the most despicable human being I have ever encountered in my lifetime.

    But, what does it say for those who will vote for her, knowing what she is, simply because she parrots the democratic socialism party line or will “protect” their “right” to scrape a fetus out of their uterus.

    • Akihito
      October 24, 2018 at 8:07 am

      That’s why they are being called NPC’s now. Just knee jerk sloganeering

  • worcester_t.rider
    October 23, 2018 at 3:15 pm

    I feel like you fundamentally misunderstand how our government works. You state:

    “I believe the people shouldn’t overturn Supreme Court decisions by voting on ballot questions, so we’re gonna go with no on that one as well.”

    This is a state referendum which has no effect on national-level politics. The referendum urges legislation which, if passed, would prevent Massachusetts politicians from receiving unlimited sums of cash for state elections. It has no effect on the national level. It has no bearing on the Supreme Court ruling. It would likely help conservatives in this state fight back against the progressive funding machine.

    We need to make sure that fellow citizens are educated in our democracy and how it works

    • worcester_t.rider
      October 23, 2018 at 5:32 pm

      I want to update my previous comment. I read the legislation and it looks as though Question 2 creates a Citizens Commission of (unpaid) citizens that will look into joining a few other states in supporting a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

      In the Citizen’s United ruling, the Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution to allow unlimited sums of money for campaign contributions, based on the premise that ‘money is speech’. I leave the choice up to the voters, but please make sure you are informed

  • Judge dread
    October 23, 2018 at 3:02 pm

    I’ve been saying this for 3 years. Those who are pro trans rights are anti woman’s rights.

  • Ray Patriarca
    October 23, 2018 at 3:00 pm

    Fuck this cunt !
    I hope she gets cancer of the eyes !
    Fucking putiach !
    Disgratziate !

    • Silvio Dante
      October 23, 2018 at 3:56 pm

      I know broads, and that one ain’t gettin’ any.

  • Hugh-Bo Mont
    October 23, 2018 at 2:35 pm

    Why do we need laws that cater to like 1.7% of the population?

    For question #1, vote no. The last thing we need is more government intervention in healthcare, or anything else for that matter.

  • Mahky Mahk Ballbag
    October 23, 2018 at 2:33 pm

    I’ll say it since nobody else will: Liz Warren is a racist , sexist jerk!

    And she looks like a praying mantis.

    • Akihito
      October 23, 2018 at 3:43 pm

      more like a braying jackass

    • Dr. Spaceman
      October 23, 2018 at 4:25 pm

      The DNA test confirmed that she does in fact share some ancestry with a praying mantis. You have to go back pretty far but it’s definitely there.

Comment on this Post

*

RELATED POSTS
Angry White Folk Are Calling This UMass Basketball “White Water” Video Reverse Racism
Jesse Jackson: Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson Is Worse Than Rosa Parks Bus Driver
Did Minnesota Vikings Fire Chris Kluwe Because He Supported Gay Marriage, or Because He Was a Liquored Up Idiot Punter?