Follow @SpinterTBS on Twitter by clicking here.
Want to advertise with Turtleboy? Email us at [email protected] for more information.
If you like free speech and want to support what we’re doing, feel free to donate to the Turtle fund:
Hey fam – if you’d like to support Turtleboy and what we do here, feel free to hit the donate button at the top. We basically have to run this site like a Bernie Sanders campaign now since we’ve been blacklisted by Google and Facebook, due to the fact that rabid SJWs keep reporting our posts. Getting blacklisted by Google is a death sentence for most websites, since it’s much harder to monetize. And we all know the damage Facebook has done. We’re never going to stop fighting for free speech, but in the meantime the best way for turtle riders to fight back is to donate to the cause. Without you people none of this is possible. We love you all.
The other day we broke this story about a harmless billboard in Charlton put up by a Sturbridge Jeweler, which is apparently racist for using satire and current events in order to get people to buy diamond rings. Our good friend Kassy Dillon at the Daily Wire, a Massachusetts native and the videographer who made Trigglypuff a household name, wrote about it and cited us in this article. Since then it’s become a national story picked up by both right and left wing media outlets.
The best part about Garieri Jewelers is that they refuse to back down. It’s such a rare quality to see in businesses, as many are predisposed to back down when the mob comes after them. And although they’ve gotten a lot of positive feedback from this, they’ve also had people like this who continue to attack them for the billboard:
Jonathan Vizard is a Southbridge resident who apparently is angry that Garieri’s is trying to profit off of a peaceful protest. Unlike Nike, which totally is not doing the exact same thing.
That’s when this douchequeef appeared out of left field:
Her name is Claire Chickering, and this pussy hat wearing resistance foot soldier is from Woodstock, CT. Here’s what she had to say about this billboard….
Nicolas Garieri was killed in Woodstock 17 years ago at the age of 18 while riding his motorcycle.
He was not at fault, nor did he have a past history of reckless driving. The motorcycle was paid for by him, and as an independent adult his parents had no control over what he chose to do.
Either way, it takes a vile, disgusting, soulless human being to bring up a tragedy like this simply because you disagree with someone’s political opinions. This is the state of discourse in our country. The people who whine the most about the vitriol that comes out of the White House are more often than not doing exactly what they accuse their enemies of doing.
But she didn’t stop there. She told her good friend Jonathan that she would smack them for the billboard:
She told them that their dead family member was voted “most hazerdous to pedestrians” in high school:
The mother of two claimed that she was worried that the deceased would run over her children, who were not born at the time he died….
The “love trumps hate” SJW told the OP that the Garieri family were a bunch of “coke cunts”:
That they should “go do some lines”
And she continued to walk all over Nicolas’ grave by making up lies about him in order to hurt his living family members because she doesn’t like a billboard….
Claire Chickering is obviously a burning trashbag full of used condoms, but Jonathan Vizard still chooses to associate with her, and didn’t ask her to stop. And if you hang around with shit then you begin to stink like it. But he didn’t want to be blamed for what she said:
Yet he’s clearly good friends with her, and made excuses for her disgusting behavior:
“Trolls attempt to obfuscate your intent.”
Translation – you shit on their dead family member, but they are to blame because they didn’t look at the reasons why you shit on their dead family member. Because her intentions were good – she called them racist because of a billboard. That was the most important part of this incident.
Jonathan Vizard works at Abacus Distributing in Southbridge, and one family member left them a negative review on their Facebook page because they hired him. We generally frown upon this tactic, as we believe you have to be better than using SJW tactics like this. The business did nothing wrong and doesn’t deserve to suffer because the employ one idiot who says dumb shit on Facebook. Abacus announced they would not be terminating him…
That’s completely fair. Meanwhile Jonathan started whining about it on Facebook, claiming he was being bullied by people who were trying to get him fired:
The irony of it all. He’s posting away, trying to slam a business for their political beliefs, while simultaneously whining that his business is being attacked of his political beliefs. Can’t make this stuff up.
If Abacus doesn’t want to fire him because of his political beliefs I think that’s great. No one should be fired for their political beliefs. My question is, does Abacus have access to a Google machine? Because the very first thing you find when you Google Jonathan Vizard is this link, detailing how he defrauded several customers while working as a mortgage broker for Norcom in 2013:
According to information reflected in the Report and gathered during the Division’s investigation, Jonathan Vizard attempted to solicit money in the form of a personal loan from at least four Massachusetts consumers who were either prospective applicants or past customers of Mr. Vizard during his employment with Norcom. (Consumer A, Consumer B, Consumer C, and Consumer D).
Yup. People came to him looking for loans to purchase their dream homes and HE asked THEM to borrow money. The exact opposite of what’s supposed to happen during one of these transactions. He used his alleged military service to try to score brownie points with customers as well. Check out what he tells Consumer A after they filed a complaint about it:
On or about July 25, 2013, Jonathan Vizard contacted Consumer A via telephone and requested a personal loan of $3,000.00, based upon Consumer A’s husband’s mutual military service with Mr. Vizard. According to information received from Consumer A, Mr. Vizard, after receiving Consumer A’s email, phoned a representative at Norcom and notified Norcom that Consumer A and her husband would be pursuing legal action against Norcom. Mr. Vizard also left two voicemails on Consumer A’s cell phone stating she was mistaken in her interpretation of the matter and “thank[ed] Consumer A for getting him fired.” The Division’s investigation revealed that Consumer A had no intention of suing Norcom. (Consumer A’s affidavit).
He thanked the consumer for getting him fired. Sound familiar?
It’s never his fault that the dumb things he chooses to do get him in trouble at work.
Consumer A never go the loan they came to him for, because he told them they would qualify for a number that was much larger than they’d actually qualify for:
In July of 2013, Consumer A was notified that she and her husband were unable to get a loan for the purchase of Charlton, Massachusetts property as the prequalification amount provided by Mr. Vizard was not accurate, and the consumers would not qualify for a $280,000 loan.
They lost their dream house as a result.
Check out what he did to this poor elderly couple trying to buy a condo:
According to information obtained through customer interviews conducted during the Division’s investigation, and information outlined in the Report, Consumer B and Consumer C, a married couple, ages 82 and 84 applied for a mortgage loan through Jonathan Vizard. On or about May 16, 2013, Mr. Vizard solicited and obtained from Consumer B and Consumer C $3,000 in the form of a personal loan.
Jonathan Vizard signed a document that was purportedly a loan document in which he agreed to make three payments in the amount of $1,033.52 over the course of three months with the first payment being due on June 15, 2013. Jonathan Vizard made his first payment of $1,033.52, and this payment was 14 days late. Jonathan Vizard failed to make any additional payments and, to date, has not made additional payments to Consumers B and C.
He stole $2,000 from them. He preyed on the elderly. And now he has the nerve to pretend to have moral superiority because he doesn’t like a harmless billboard.
But he wasn’t done bullying the old couple:
According to the Report submitted by Norcom, on July 31, 2013, Jonathan Vizard contacted Consumers B and C to inform them of his termination from Norcom and repeated a warning that he had made on previous occasions, “that if the consumers reported Mr. Vizard’s conduct to Norcom he would sue them in civil court.” According to the information reflected in the Report, the consumers were “sufficiently restrained and did not notify Norcom of Mr. Vizard’s actions throughout their dealings with him.”
He threatened to sue them in civil court if they reported the fact that he defrauded them of $2,000 to his employer. As a result the elderly couple was scared and chose not to notify Norcom. He literally intimidates and steals form elderly people, and then calls other people racist in order to pretend that he’s one of the good guys. You’re not a good person Jonathan, and we’re not some elderly couple you can scam and push around. We’re not afraid of calling maggots like you out publicly. Why would Abacus Distributing choose to hire a person like this?
The elderly couple never got their condo because Jonathan Vizard told them to ignore critical paperwork from Norcom, and lied to them about a loan they’d be able to qualify for:
Between March 2013 and May 2013 Mr. Vizard continued to assure Consumers B and C that they would be able to obtain a loan. During this period, Consumers B and C also received documents from Norcom’s main office in Avon, Connecticut on at least two occasions detailing what it would cost them to complete the loan process. Mr. Vizard advised Consumers B and C to ignore the paperwork sent from Norcom.
Jonathan Vizard attempted to defraud another client out of $12K which he said he needed for private schooling for his kids, and then asked for another loan to get his license back after he blamed them for losing it:
On or about September 2012, Jonathan Vizard contacted Consumer D and requested a loan in the amount of $12,000.00 to pay for private school fees for his children. Consumer D refused to lend Jonathan Vizard the money, and Mr. Vizard thereafter requested monetary assistance from any friends or family members of Consumer D. On or about January 2013, Jonathan Vizard contacted Consumer D by telephone claiming he had lost his license and needed a personal loan to get his license back.
How pathetic is this? He asks his own clients for money, they tell him no, so he then asks them to hit up their family members for cash. And he has the nerve to cast judgement on these people for being “racist” Trump supporters. Amazing.
Lastly, he told Consumer E that he’d be able to get them a loan, even though the consumer had only recently obtained employment:
Consumer E was told by Jonathan Vizard that after thirty (30) days of verifiable employment, he would qualify for a loan for the purchase of a home. Based upon representations made by Mr. Vizard regarding his eligibility for a mortgage loan, Consumer E placed an offer to purchase a home and the offer was accepted. Jonathan Vizard notified Consumer E that the loan would close on or around May 2013. Mr. Vizard communicated this date knowing that the loan program for which Consumer E qualified for required the borrower be employed for six months. Based on this information Consumer E would not qualify for the loan until November 2013. As a result of Jonathan Vizard’s misrepresentations to Consumer E regarding the conditions regarding his eligibility for a loan, Consumer E was unable to complete the purchase of his home.
And the consumer once again lost out on their dream home.
It’s a pleasure exposing people like this for a living. Assholes who attack small businesses, defraud the elderly, steal from people, get people’s hopes up about moving into their dream house knowing full well it will never happen, and then shitting on dead family members because Trump literally owns every ounce of your brain.