Current events

Brockton Skagbag Arrested For Burning Cigarettes On Children She Was Babysitting, Abusing Them For 6 Months, Is Free And Still Has Her Kids On Facebook

Brockton Skagbag Arrested For Burning Cigarettes On Children She Was Babysitting, Abusing Them For 6 Months, Is Free And Still Has Her Kids On Facebook

Want to advertise with Turtleboy? Email us at for more information.

Screen Shot 2015-12-01 at 10.29.56 AM




This is 32 year old Nancy Intelisano of Brockton:

Last summer she was arrested for abusing children she was supposed to be babysitting, which included burning cigarettes on their bodies:

The mother of two young boys, who police said were abused for months by their Brockton babysitter Nancy Intelisano, said she has received threatening text messages from Intelisano and her family. “She has made threats that her and her family will get back at us for this and will bury me, via text message and over the phone to me and the father of my kids,” the alleged victims’ mother said in court Monday. Because the boys are minors and because they are victims of alleged abuse, The Enterprise is withholding their identities. The name of the boys’ mother is also being withheld to protect the their identities. Intelisano was in Brockton District Court Monday for a restraining order hearing, which was filed for by the children’s mother. Intelisano, 31, is facing 16 child abuse charges after being accused of horrifically abusing a 4-year-old boy and his 9-year-old brother over a period of six months. She is currently being held on $50,000 bail.

Being burned with cigarettes, beaten with a spoon, tortured with water, belittled and abused. That is how police said Intelisano would punish the boys for what she considered misbehavior, according to court documents obtained by The Enterprise. On May 4, the allegations came to light when the 4-year-old’s mother took him to a local hospital because he had broken his arm. Intelisano told the boy’s mother that he was jumping from couch to couch and fell when she was babysitting. A doctor at the hospital said that his injuries were not consistent with falling from a couch, but rather from a forceful push or pull from another person, court records show.

The Department of Children and Families was notified and the boy was taken to Boston Children’s Hospital for further evaluation, court records show. At Boston Children’s Hospital, doctors said he had suffered bruising on his stomach, scratches on his face, a black eye, bruising on his right arm, a chipped tooth, a left arm fracture, a burn on his upper lip and an open sore on his palm. Intelisano would make up stories about how the boys got their injuries and threatened to have DCF take them away if they did not go along with the stories of falls and rough housing, court records show. While the police and DCF were investigating the allegations of abuse, the victims’ mother said she received threats from Intelisano and her family.

“I’m in fear of retaliation from her or her family and I am afraid of physical violence or threats against me and my children,” she said in court Monday. “My kids are afraid. My 4-year-old wakes up in the middle of the night.”

Alright first of all, the mother seems hardly any better than the babysitter. I blame her equally. You know the kind of people you hire to babysit your kids. It’s on you if you hire a trashbag and they abuse your kids multiple times over the course of months.

Secondly, why is she babysitting them so much? Where are Mom and Dad going? The club? Nope. Our sources tell us that they were actually at work. So why was this woman constantly there if she’s just a babysitter? Turns out she actually lived there, and we are told she was dating the baby daddy. Ya got that? The sperm donor is shacking up with the abusive mistress babysitter, while still living with the baby momma, and NO ONE knew these kids were being abused repeatedly. Good thing the Brockton Enterprise isn’t releasing the name of the mother. She’s the real victim here because she got threatening text messages from her trashbag abusive friend.

I’m sorry, if your kids are being abused by the babysitter over a period of six months, and you don’t know about it, then you don’t get to be a victim. You are a co-conspirator. A real parent would see their children covered in bruises when they gave them baths. Any loving mother knows when something is up with their kid. If this can happen under your roof without you knowing about it, you shouldn’t be allowed to have kids. Now she’s playing the victim card since it’s become public, and she’s rewarded for it with anonymity.

Anyway, this was a year ago, and we can’t find anything on this case since then. But from the looks of Nancy Intelisano’s Facebook page she’s carrying on like a regular, law abiding citizen who just so happened to repeatedly abuse children she was living with over the course of six months. She’s working at Autozone, and like 99% of female ratchets, she claims to be a CNA:

I swear, these people are drawn to this career because they get to wear scrubs to work and it makes them believe they are doctors while still wearing the kind of clothes they’d go grocery shopping in at Walmart.

Oh, and she also has her own children, who by the looks of the pictures she’s posting online, are still living with her:

So that’s good.

Where the hell is DCF on this one? Does anyone in this state actually give a shit about children? The crackhead mother of Jeremiah Oliver just got an extremely lenient sentence after she helped her boyfriend kill her 5 year old son, stuff his dead body in a suitcase, and then mislead investigators for months about the location of the suitcase. Oh, and Bella Bond’s mother is gonna be back on the streets cashing in food stamps for heroin money any day now.

At the end of the day you’re much, much more protected in Massachusetts if you’re a drug dealing illegal immigrant than if you’re a vulnerable child with abusive parents. This isn’t hyperbole either. It’s a fact. Remember what Brockton’s State Representative posted a few months ago on Facebook?

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 10.02.26 AM

Yup. Michelle DuBois will go out of her way to help drug dealers hide from federal drug agents. But I haven’t heard a peep from her about protecting the children of Brockton from animals who burn cigarettes on them. Plus, it’s not like the feds are raiding the cleaning lady’s apartment. They’re going after known drug dealers who are here illegally. This was news to Michelle though:

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 10.01.18 AM

She even said that the legal citizens she represents only get 90% of her attention:

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 10.02.17 AM

Although that sometimes changes to 95% depending on who’s asking:

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 10.18.49 AM

Hey Michelle, how bout you stop being a useless slugrake and actually advocate for children who are here legally, and who by not fault of their own are victims of abuse? Ya know, because they can’t speak for themselves. Because they’re kids. How bout we pass a law that says you don’t get custody of your kids if you get arrested for repeatedly beating the shit out of your crack buddy’s children while being a live-in babysitter mistress?

Nah, better protect drug dealers instead. If anyone runs against this idiot in 2018 they have our unwavering support. She’s gotta go.


We urge you to support the following local businesses. 

Screen Shot 2017-02-01 at 10.32.58 AM

Screen Shot 2015-12-01 at 10.29.56 AM

Screen Shot 2017-02-27 at 10.14.48 AM

Screen Shot 2017-03-31 at 2.17.19 PM


4ba27317-991b-4352-b70d-f489eadcfdef (1)

Screen Shot 2017-03-25 at 8.48.23 PM

12 Comment(s)
  • August 30, 2017 at 9:57 pm

    I was wondering if you ever considered changing the
    structure of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content
    so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text
    for only having 1 or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out

  • ForReallyReal??
    August 16, 2017 at 2:33 pm

    I really don’t understand this. Please clarify! A State Rep is warning citizens to be on the LOOK-OUT for drug busts?? Am I reading THIS Correct? Huh????

  • me
    August 11, 2017 at 12:14 pm

    why are you always hating on CNAs? they work hard and do things a lot of people wouldnt be willing to, and they do it all for shit pay.

    • Black Thighs Matter
      August 16, 2017 at 3:26 pm

      Most CNAs I know are in that job market for the drugs they can pilfer from patients…and the occasional jewelry.

  • Guttermuppet
    August 10, 2017 at 9:00 am

    How the fuck did this article become another Michelle DuBois post? WTF?

  • They call me Ponch
    August 9, 2017 at 10:07 pm

    Off to the new Women’s Penal Colony of Chicago.



    This is easy people.

  • The Rant Queen
    August 9, 2017 at 3:07 pm

    DCF workers don’t make much money taking kids who are considered “damaged goods” or “unadoptable”. Kids who have been abused, have scars- both physical and emotional- need lots of special attention, therapy, etc.

    That costs money, people don’t typically adopt children who will cost them more money or make their family look bad, so DCF will usually go after kids who aren’t actually being abused,but whose mother is unfortunate enough to have a shitty, back stabbing friend or spiteful family member, who called them (anonymously) and filed a 51A.

    The “investigator” will open a case for the smallest reason. The most popular go-to is “Negligence”, and it will be because the mom didn’t SEEM to brush her kid’s hair that day, or their face had some ice cream still stuck on their face, and it looked like “old dirt”. They LOVE making the mothers go to counseling, for some reason.

    They love teen moms around my area, they manipulate and bully the terrified new moms, right out of the hospital, into giving up their parental rights. They make promises that it’s temporary, give them a service plan, then when the mom completes it, forces them to sign a new one with more shit added to it, meanwhile they’ve already found a suitable couple to adopt the child. Next thing the new moms know, they’re in court (they usually can’t afford their own lawyers and are stuck with an appointed one who won’t fight very hard for them, because they’re basically fighting their own boss.) being pressured to sign over their rights.

    Now, some workers actually want to help the family stay together, but not all of them do. My sister gave up her first born to DCF, and though they claim they’ll give temporary custody to next of kin, they didn’t do that for us. My mom fought for her grandchild and was more than capable of taking care of my niece. But the worker already had her eyes set on adopting her out. A nice lesbian couple, who seemed to care for my niece well, which was a relief since the last foster home she had been in, she was severely abused. Came to a visit and my 2yr old niece had a black eye. Foster mom claimed she walked into the couch. Now, I don’t know about you people, but unless this bitch’s couch was made of stone, I’m not buying that half ass story.

    Anyway, my sister’s worker made sure to scare my sister into giving up the fight. And she did. My mom only gave up after realizing my sister was never going to change and that her granddaughter was better off with the adoptive couple. They are no longer together and my niece spends her life bouncing from one house to another. She’ll be 11 in October and she was taken when she was 2. I haven’t seen her since that last visit, with the black eye.

    My sister wasn’t meant to be a mother, this isn’t news to me. I took care of my niece more often than she did. And in this case, DCF was right to open the case. But her worker didn’t try to help my sister keep her child or better their lives. She wanted my niece the second she saw how adorable and smart she was. She wanted to get that big fat check for adopting out a “system child.”

    That’s why abused children don’t usually get taken unless there’s substantial evidence of life threatening activity. Then they bounce from foster to foster, until they’re 18 and hopefully have jobs and money put away to get an apartment. But in this area, it’s more likely they’ll end up on the street.

    • Finn
      August 9, 2017 at 10:05 pm

      Rant Queen,
      This is a “comments” section, not a diary. #whocares

    • Black Thighs Matter
      August 16, 2017 at 3:24 pm

      No bias here…just FACKS! Because everyone with children has DCF up their asses and cannot afford a lawyer. Guess what, Ms. Victim, if you cannot afford a lawyer, you probably can’t afford a child which is cheaper because you get a payment plan. Plus you undoubtedly have the taxpayers paying for everything, including your housing. I think you are just butthurt because when DCF takes your kids, you get a reduction in benefits until the next parasite slithers out of your clam trap.

  • Michele Dubois' Evil Twin
    August 9, 2017 at 2:41 pm

    They are not citizens if they are here illegally. They are trespassers. And, because I can shoot someone breaking into my house as an imminent threat, so should it be with illegal trespassers as they are an immediate threat. SHOOT TO KILL the vermin flowing over the borders that refuse to recognize out sovereignty and laws…THE END.

    • Guttermuppet
      August 10, 2017 at 9:05 am

      Yeah, except in MA you don’t have the right to shoot someone for trespassing unless you “order them to leave repeatedly” and they don’t comply. And then you still might get fucked for it, because this is Massachusetts, liberal heaven.

  • Finn
    August 9, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    So is it 90 or 95% of her time spent on “legal” citizens? Confusing…

Comment on this Post


Insane Abuse Story Involving Dog The Bounty Hunter, MMA Psychopath “War Machine”, And Porn Star Christy Mack Is Better Than Any Reality TV Ever
Social Darwinism: Yet Another Example Of How Much Herd-Thinning We Need
The “Race Police” Are Running Out Of Stuff To “Bitch” About, So They Are Branching Out to Sexism